<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1315 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370972</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment for the A.Y 2005-06 under Section 147 of the IT Act due to the lack of tangible material and a clear nexus between the assessee and the reasons for reopening. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Cross Objection by the assessee was also dismissed as it became academic following the invalidation of the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1315 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370972</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment for the A.Y 2005-06 under Section 147 of the IT Act due to the lack of tangible material and a clear nexus between the assessee and the reasons for reopening. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Cross Objection by the assessee was also dismissed as it became academic following the invalidation of the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>