<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1313 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370970</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by overturning the disallowance of the provision for interest expenses related to government loans. The tribunal found that the provision made for accumulated interest on government loans was not covered under section 43B of the Act, as it pertained to loans from specified financial institutions. Therefore, the tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision and held that the provision for interest was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1313 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370970</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by overturning the disallowance of the provision for interest expenses related to government loans. The tribunal found that the provision made for accumulated interest on government loans was not covered under section 43B of the Act, as it pertained to loans from specified financial institutions. Therefore, the tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision and held that the provision for interest was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>