https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370965 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal concerning the short levy of Anti-Dumping Duty due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act. The court ruled that the petitioner should have pursued a statutory appeal under Section 130 for substantial questions of law against the interlocutory order, rather than filing a writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of following statutory procedures and left open the option for the petitioner to invoke Section 130 if deemed appropriate. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370965 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal concerning the short levy of Anti-Dumping Duty due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act. The court ruled that the petitioner should have pursued a statutory appeal under Section 130 for substantial questions of law against the interlocutory order, rather than filing a writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of following statutory procedures and left open the option for the petitioner to invoke Section 130 if deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370965