<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1306 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported raw jute cutting should be classified under Tariff Heading 5303.1010 and granting the appellant the benefits of exemption notifications. The Tribunal also upheld the dropping of the demand for two Bills of Entry due to the limitation period, setting aside the orders of the primary adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:38:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1306 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported raw jute cutting should be classified under Tariff Heading 5303.1010 and granting the appellant the benefits of exemption notifications. The Tribunal also upheld the dropping of the demand for two Bills of Entry due to the limitation period, setting aside the orders of the primary adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>