<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1304 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370961</link>
    <description>A final customs assessment on bills of entry, after examination and clearance of the goods, cannot be reopened through a fresh demand unless the department lawfully challenges that assessment. On the facts stated, no departmental appeal had been filed, so the assessment had attained finality and the demand was unsustainable. A separate allegation of suppression and misdeclaration also failed because the importer had filed invoices and related documents, the goods were physically examined, and no evidence showed non-disclosure or false description. The extended demand and penalty were therefore not supportable, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1304 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370961</link>
      <description>A final customs assessment on bills of entry, after examination and clearance of the goods, cannot be reopened through a fresh demand unless the department lawfully challenges that assessment. On the facts stated, no departmental appeal had been filed, so the assessment had attained finality and the demand was unsustainable. A separate allegation of suppression and misdeclaration also failed because the importer had filed invoices and related documents, the goods were physically examined, and no evidence showed non-disclosure or false description. The extended demand and penalty were therefore not supportable, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>