<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15405</link>
    <description>Agricultural income-tax cannot be imposed merely because land is classified in revenue records as &quot;tope&quot;; the tax depends on proof that income was derived from land by agriculture or by processes ordinarily used to make produce marketable. The distinction between basic agricultural operations, such as cultivation and sowing, and subsequent operations, such as tending and harvesting, remains central. On the stated facts, there was no evidence of actual cultivation, agricultural operations, or agricultural income, so the classification alone was insufficient. The assessment and revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, though reassessment was left open if agricultural operations and income are later established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15405</link>
      <description>Agricultural income-tax cannot be imposed merely because land is classified in revenue records as &quot;tope&quot;; the tax depends on proof that income was derived from land by agriculture or by processes ordinarily used to make produce marketable. The distinction between basic agricultural operations, such as cultivation and sowing, and subsequent operations, such as tending and harvesting, remains central. On the stated facts, there was no evidence of actual cultivation, agricultural operations, or agricultural income, so the classification alone was insufficient. The assessment and revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, though reassessment was left open if agricultural operations and income are later established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>