<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1291 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the 12-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals) due to failure to pre-deposit the required amount. The Tribunal found the delay to be within the condonable period and remanded the case back to the Commissioner(Appeals) for disposal on merits. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the Commissioner(Appeals) had not properly considered the power of condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1291 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the 12-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals) due to failure to pre-deposit the required amount. The Tribunal found the delay to be within the condonable period and remanded the case back to the Commissioner(Appeals) for disposal on merits. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the Commissioner(Appeals) had not properly considered the power of condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>