<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370944</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeal concerning the classification of the vehicle &quot;Mahindra Armada&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It ruled that such classification disputes should be directed to the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, rather than being entertained at the High Court level under Section 35G. The Court emphasized that issues of classification affecting duty rates should be addressed at the Supreme Court level, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370944</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeal concerning the classification of the vehicle &quot;Mahindra Armada&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It ruled that such classification disputes should be directed to the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, rather than being entertained at the High Court level under Section 35G. The Court emphasized that issues of classification affecting duty rates should be addressed at the Supreme Court level, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>