<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1278 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370935</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the order that confirmed the demand of duty, interest, and penalties. The tribunal concluded that the allegations of clandestine removal of Pig Iron without payment of duty were not substantiated by reliable evidence. It emphasized the requirement for concrete and corroborative evidence to prove such serious charges, highlighting the lack of tangible proof in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1278 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370935</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the order that confirmed the demand of duty, interest, and penalties. The tribunal concluded that the allegations of clandestine removal of Pig Iron without payment of duty were not substantiated by reliable evidence. It emphasized the requirement for concrete and corroborative evidence to prove such serious charges, highlighting the lack of tangible proof in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>