<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1276 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act on the appellant for wrongfully availing cenvat credit on capital goods. The Tribunal found that the excess credit was due to a clerical error, not an attempt to evade duty payment. As there was no willful misstatement or suppression of facts, the penalty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appellant&#039;s appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1276 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act on the appellant for wrongfully availing cenvat credit on capital goods. The Tribunal found that the excess credit was due to a clerical error, not an attempt to evade duty payment. As there was no willful misstatement or suppression of facts, the penalty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the appellant&#039;s appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>