<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for rectification of mistake under Section 35(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the quantification of CENVAT Credit to be disallowed based on the correct formula under Rule 6(3A) instead of the previously referenced Rule 6(3). The error in the rule reference was acknowledged by the Revenue&#039;s representative, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to rectify the mistake and provide clear guidance for the quantification process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for rectification of mistake under Section 35(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the quantification of CENVAT Credit to be disallowed based on the correct formula under Rule 6(3A) instead of the previously referenced Rule 6(3). The error in the rule reference was acknowledged by the Revenue&#039;s representative, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to rectify the mistake and provide clear guidance for the quantification process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>