<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1274 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370931</link>
    <description>Goods expressly covered by the tariff headings for absorbent cotton wool and cotton carded must be classified under those specific entries, not shifted to Chapter 30 as wadding, gauze, bandages or similar medical-use articles merely because they are supplied to hospitals or bear medical packaging. Classification must follow the terms of the headings and sub-headings; use, packing and end-use become relevant only if no specific entry applies. Applying this interpretative rule and the coordinate decision relied on, the Tribunal held the goods remained under the specific tariff entries, the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was available, and the demand could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1274 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370931</link>
      <description>Goods expressly covered by the tariff headings for absorbent cotton wool and cotton carded must be classified under those specific entries, not shifted to Chapter 30 as wadding, gauze, bandages or similar medical-use articles merely because they are supplied to hospitals or bear medical packaging. Classification must follow the terms of the headings and sub-headings; use, packing and end-use become relevant only if no specific entry applies. Applying this interpretative rule and the coordinate decision relied on, the Tribunal held the goods remained under the specific tariff entries, the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was available, and the demand could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>