<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15389</link>
    <description>The court upheld the disallowance of Rs. 40,000 in commission paid to employees but allowed the deduction of Rs. 12,791 under Rule 6D for directors. The judgment emphasized consistency in decision-making based on relevant legal provisions and precedents, providing clarity on the application of rules and deductions in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 24 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15389</link>
      <description>The court upheld the disallowance of Rs. 40,000 in commission paid to employees but allowed the deduction of Rs. 12,791 under Rule 6D for directors. The judgment emphasized consistency in decision-making based on relevant legal provisions and precedents, providing clarity on the application of rules and deductions in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>