<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Appellant: Petitioned Lignite Price Not Approved, Misclassified as Transaction Value.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42877</link>
    <description>Undervaluation - cost of lignite extraction - once petitioned price has not been approved by this authority, the appellant has no right to recover the same from RWPL - the petitioned price cannot be categorised as price actually payable. Hence, is wrongly considered as the transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Appellant: Petitioned Lignite Price Not Approved, Misclassified as Transaction Value.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42877</link>
      <description>Undervaluation - cost of lignite extraction - once petitioned price has not been approved by this authority, the appellant has no right to recover the same from RWPL - the petitioned price cannot be categorised as price actually payable. Hence, is wrongly considered as the transaction value.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>