<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1256 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370913</link>
    <description>Interest earned on short-term fixed deposits made out of borrowed funds was treated as taxable revenue income, and the assessee could not automatically set off the corresponding interest paid on the borrowings unless the Act specifically allowed such deduction. The fact that the deposits were funded by borrowings did not change the character of the receipt or expand the available statutory deductions. Salary expenditure incurred before commencement of business was also disallowed against fixed-deposit interest, because no business income had yet arisen and the expense was not deductible under that head. The Revenue&#039;s appeals succeeded and the assessment order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1256 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370913</link>
      <description>Interest earned on short-term fixed deposits made out of borrowed funds was treated as taxable revenue income, and the assessee could not automatically set off the corresponding interest paid on the borrowings unless the Act specifically allowed such deduction. The fact that the deposits were funded by borrowings did not change the character of the receipt or expand the available statutory deductions. Salary expenditure incurred before commencement of business was also disallowed against fixed-deposit interest, because no business income had yet arisen and the expense was not deductible under that head. The Revenue&#039;s appeals succeeded and the assessment order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>