<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 concerning unexplained jewelry valuation and cash in hand addition. Regarding the jewelry valuation, the Tribunal favored the assessee, citing past decisions where similar additions for family members were deleted. In the case of cash in hand, the Tribunal reduced the addition from Rs. 1.5 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh, considering the financial status and evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1246 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 concerning unexplained jewelry valuation and cash in hand addition. Regarding the jewelry valuation, the Tribunal favored the assessee, citing past decisions where similar additions for family members were deleted. In the case of cash in hand, the Tribunal reduced the addition from Rs. 1.5 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh, considering the financial status and evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>