<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1245 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 16,99,500 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for suppression of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation false and unsupported by evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The challenge regarding the validity of the jurisdiction for imposing the penalty was not addressed due to procedural deficiencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1245 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 16,99,500 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for suppression of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation false and unsupported by evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The challenge regarding the validity of the jurisdiction for imposing the penalty was not addressed due to procedural deficiencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>