<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15379</link>
    <description>The High Court held that electrical transformers were not eligible for extra shift allowance under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court determined that transformers were independent items under the general depreciation rate, not integral parts of textile processing machinery. Relying on the interpretation of the rules and precedent, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the extra shift allowance to the transformers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15379</link>
      <description>The High Court held that electrical transformers were not eligible for extra shift allowance under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court determined that transformers were independent items under the general depreciation rate, not integral parts of textile processing machinery. Relying on the interpretation of the rules and precedent, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the extra shift allowance to the transformers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>