<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370890</link>
    <description>Restrictions on the right to travel abroad under the Passports Act must be confined to the Act&#039;s express statutory grounds. The phrase &quot;security of India&quot; in Sections 6 and 10 was held not to include &quot;economic security of India&quot;, because enlarging it by interpretation would create a new ground for curtailing personal liberty. A passport authority may rely on Customs information, but it must apply independent statutory judgment and verify that the facts fit the Act&#039;s grounds before impounding or requiring surrender. Mechanical action on a departmental communication was treated as an unlawful abdication of discretion, and the notices were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370890</link>
      <description>Restrictions on the right to travel abroad under the Passports Act must be confined to the Act&#039;s express statutory grounds. The phrase &quot;security of India&quot; in Sections 6 and 10 was held not to include &quot;economic security of India&quot;, because enlarging it by interpretation would create a new ground for curtailing personal liberty. A passport authority may rely on Customs information, but it must apply independent statutory judgment and verify that the facts fit the Act&#039;s grounds before impounding or requiring surrender. Mechanical action on a departmental communication was treated as an unlawful abdication of discretion, and the notices were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>