<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for the period from 15.09.2006 to 31.03.2008. However, the penalties imposed under Section 78 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld for the period prior to 15.09.2006. The decision emphasized the importance of disclosing information to tax authorities and the repercussions of suppressing facts in tax-related issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for the period from 15.09.2006 to 31.03.2008. However, the penalties imposed under Section 78 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld for the period prior to 15.09.2006. The decision emphasized the importance of disclosing information to tax authorities and the repercussions of suppressing facts in tax-related issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>