https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370866 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-Appellants, holding that the Department's delay in issuing the notice exceeded the limitation period. The Tribunal found the assessee-Appellants' actions to be bonafide as they had deposited the Service Tax and interest, rectified the wrongly availed Cenvat Credit, and cited legal precedents to support its decision. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed should not be upheld, allowing the appeal with consequential benefit for the assessee-Appellants. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:56:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370866 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-Appellants, holding that the Department's delay in issuing the notice exceeded the limitation period. The Tribunal found the assessee-Appellants' actions to be bonafide as they had deposited the Service Tax and interest, rectified the wrongly availed Cenvat Credit, and cited legal precedents to support its decision. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed should not be upheld, allowing the appeal with consequential benefit for the assessee-Appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370866