https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370855 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellant, engaged in manufacturing steel products, regarding the valuation of goods for Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal held that the appellant could avail Cenvat Credit based on supplementary invoices from a sister unit, despite the Department's argument for a higher duty rate. It was determined that the supplementary invoices, reflecting a transfer of goods with differential duty paid by the sister unit, were valid for Cenvat Credit under Rule 9(1) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The impugned order demanding Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty was set aside. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:55:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370855 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellant, engaged in manufacturing steel products, regarding the valuation of goods for Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal held that the appellant could avail Cenvat Credit based on supplementary invoices from a sister unit, despite the Department's argument for a higher duty rate. It was determined that the supplementary invoices, reflecting a transfer of goods with differential duty paid by the sister unit, were valid for Cenvat Credit under Rule 9(1) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The impugned order demanding Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370855