<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1194 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370851</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding final orders and ensuring that refund claims are not denied arbitrarily, especially when the underlying demand has been set aside by the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1194 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370851</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding final orders and ensuring that refund claims are not denied arbitrarily, especially when the underlying demand has been set aside by the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>