<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1193 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370850</link>
    <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to appellate or revisional proceedings under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The court treated the issue as settled by an earlier coordinate Bench and held that the special VAT statute excludes recourse to condonation under that provision. As a result, delay could not be excused and the belated revision was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1193 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370850</link>
      <description>Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to appellate or revisional proceedings under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The court treated the issue as settled by an earlier coordinate Bench and held that the special VAT statute excludes recourse to condonation under that provision. As a result, delay could not be excused and the belated revision was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>