<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1399 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277113</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal filed by the Managing Director of the appellant against the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable due to lack of establishing mens rea and granted consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1399 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277113</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal filed by the Managing Director of the appellant against the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable due to lack of establishing mens rea and granted consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>