<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1616 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 54F for all six flats obtained under the Joint Development Agreement. It emphasized that the amendment to Section 54F by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014, was prospective and not applicable to the assessee&#039;s case for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents from Karnataka and Madras High Courts to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1616 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 54F for all six flats obtained under the Joint Development Agreement. It emphasized that the amendment to Section 54F by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014, was prospective and not applicable to the assessee&#039;s case for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents from Karnataka and Madras High Courts to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>