<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1863 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 54.35 crores made by the A.O. under section 68, as the amount was received in a previous year and not the year under review. The Tribunal referenced judicial precedents emphasizing that credits from prior years cannot be deemed unexplained cash credits in subsequent years. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1863 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 54.35 crores made by the A.O. under section 68, as the amount was received in a previous year and not the year under review. The Tribunal referenced judicial precedents emphasizing that credits from prior years cannot be deemed unexplained cash credits in subsequent years. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>