<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15372</link>
    <description>The court held that the capital redemption reserve should be considered part of the capital for surtax computation, aligning with the nature of share capital as per the Companies Act. The judgment favored the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and answering the referred question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15372</link>
      <description>The court held that the capital redemption reserve should be considered part of the capital for surtax computation, aligning with the nature of share capital as per the Companies Act. The judgment favored the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and answering the referred question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>