https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277107 The court found the 1st defendant liable for the amount of the hundi as the payee's endorsement was forged, making them responsible to the true owner. Additionally, the 2nd defendant was held liable for converting the hundi through forged endorsements, requiring payment to the true owner. The court determined that the property in the hundi remained with the plaintiff at the date of the suit, resulting in a judgment against both defendants in favor of the plaintiff for a specified amount. en-us Sat, 04 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:27:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277107 The court found the 1st defendant liable for the amount of the hundi as the payee's endorsement was forged, making them responsible to the true owner. Additionally, the 2nd defendant was held liable for converting the hundi through forged endorsements, requiring payment to the true owner. The court determined that the property in the hundi remained with the plaintiff at the date of the suit, resulting in a judgment against both defendants in favor of the plaintiff for a specified amount. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 04 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277107