<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15364</link>
    <description>Customs duty and sales tax were held not to qualify as expenditure for weighted deduction under section 35B, because statutory liabilities are not deductible expenditure for that purpose. Expenses incurred in India for maintaining a foreign office also did not satisfy section 35B(1)(b)(iv), which requires maintenance of a branch or office outside India. The assessee was therefore not entitled to weighted deduction on the disputed items, and the reference was answered against the assessee on both substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15364</link>
      <description>Customs duty and sales tax were held not to qualify as expenditure for weighted deduction under section 35B, because statutory liabilities are not deductible expenditure for that purpose. Expenses incurred in India for maintaining a foreign office also did not satisfy section 35B(1)(b)(iv), which requires maintenance of a branch or office outside India. The assessee was therefore not entitled to weighted deduction on the disputed items, and the reference was answered against the assessee on both substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>