https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370819 The High Court allowed the criminal appeal, overturning the Appellate Court's decision that reversed the trial court's judgment convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found the Appellate Court's reasoning flawed, emphasizing that variations in ink colors and writings on the cheques did not constitute material alterations. The court rejected the defense's argument that the cheques were security for a mortgage loan due to inconsistencies in the cheques' information and witnesses' testimonies. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:25:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370819 The High Court allowed the criminal appeal, overturning the Appellate Court's decision that reversed the trial court's judgment convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court found the Appellate Court's reasoning flawed, emphasizing that variations in ink colors and writings on the cheques did not constitute material alterations. The court rejected the defense's argument that the cheques were security for a mortgage loan due to inconsistencies in the cheques' information and witnesses' testimonies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370819