https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370818 The High Court held that the impugned order was appealable under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, and directed the petitioner to utilize the statutory appeal remedy instead of approaching the writ jurisdiction. The Court granted condonation of delay for filing the appeal, ordered a stay on coercive action for four weeks, and required a pre-deposit related to services tax and interest, excluding the penalty, for the appeal to proceed. The petitioner was instructed to follow the appeal process and the case was disposed accordingly. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:25:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370818 The High Court held that the impugned order was appealable under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, and directed the petitioner to utilize the statutory appeal remedy instead of approaching the writ jurisdiction. The Court granted condonation of delay for filing the appeal, ordered a stay on coercive action for four weeks, and required a pre-deposit related to services tax and interest, excluding the penalty, for the appeal to proceed. The petitioner was instructed to follow the appeal process and the case was disposed accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370818