<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1152 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on construction services provided in joint venture projects was not sustainable under the categories of &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&#039; or &#039;Construction of Complex Service&#039; for periods before and after 1.6.2007. It clarified that post 1.6.2007, composite contracts should be classified under &#039;Works Contract Service&#039;. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1152 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on construction services provided in joint venture projects was not sustainable under the categories of &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&#039; or &#039;Construction of Complex Service&#039; for periods before and after 1.6.2007. It clarified that post 1.6.2007, composite contracts should be classified under &#039;Works Contract Service&#039;. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>