https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15361 The appellate court dismissed all criminal appeals, confirming the trial court's acquittal orders. The complainant failed to prove the accused accepted cash deposits without reasonable cause, and lacked necessary affidavits to disprove explanations. The court found the complaint deficient in specifying responsible company officers under Section 278B. The court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing limited interference with acquittals unless wholly unreasonable. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15361 The appellate court dismissed all criminal appeals, confirming the trial court's acquittal orders. The complainant failed to prove the accused accepted cash deposits without reasonable cause, and lacked necessary affidavits to disprove explanations. The court found the complaint deficient in specifying responsible company officers under Section 278B. The court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing limited interference with acquittals unless wholly unreasonable. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15361