<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1145 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370802</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the term &quot;tyres&quot; in the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 does not include rubber tyres, leading to the assessee being assessed under the State Act rather than the Central Act. The judgment emphasized interpreting the term in conjunction with related items and trade practices, ultimately determining the assessee&#039;s tax liability under the State Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1145 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370802</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the term &quot;tyres&quot; in the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 does not include rubber tyres, leading to the assessee being assessed under the State Act rather than the Central Act. The judgment emphasized interpreting the term in conjunction with related items and trade practices, ultimately determining the assessee&#039;s tax liability under the State Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>