<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370792</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner, engaged in the mobile handset business, to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs and provide a bank guarantee of a similar amount to reinstate their First Appeal challenging the VAT assessment. The Court overturned the orders of the VAT authority and the First Appellate Authority, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal before the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370792</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner, engaged in the mobile handset business, to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs and provide a bank guarantee of a similar amount to reinstate their First Appeal challenging the VAT assessment. The Court overturned the orders of the VAT authority and the First Appellate Authority, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal before the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>