<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1158 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on prior period expenses, notional interest on land purchases, EPF contributions, and depreciation on electrical installations. However, it modified the disallowance on repair and maintenance expenses, reducing it to Rs. 150,000 due to insufficient examination of expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1158 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on prior period expenses, notional interest on land purchases, EPF contributions, and depreciation on electrical installations. However, it modified the disallowance on repair and maintenance expenses, reducing it to Rs. 150,000 due to insufficient examination of expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>