<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277088</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the notice of motion seeking to quash an order passed by the Registrar/Prothonotary &amp;amp; Senior Master due to a significant delay of 1371 days in moving the motion. The applicant/appellant&#039;s reasons for the delay were deemed unjustified, highlighting the need for Revenue/Department of Income Tax officials to adhere to procedural rules and ensure timely compliance. The court criticized the negligent attitude of Revenue officials and emphasized the importance of accountability and vigilance in pursuing legal cases with substantial implications. The decision to dismiss the motion was based on the court&#039;s stance against condoning lapses in the functioning of Revenue officials and the necessity for strict procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277088</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the notice of motion seeking to quash an order passed by the Registrar/Prothonotary &amp;amp; Senior Master due to a significant delay of 1371 days in moving the motion. The applicant/appellant&#039;s reasons for the delay were deemed unjustified, highlighting the need for Revenue/Department of Income Tax officials to adhere to procedural rules and ensure timely compliance. The court criticized the negligent attitude of Revenue officials and emphasized the importance of accountability and vigilance in pursuing legal cases with substantial implications. The decision to dismiss the motion was based on the court&#039;s stance against condoning lapses in the functioning of Revenue officials and the necessity for strict procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>