https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277089 The Kerala HC addressed whether a trial's final judgment should be deferred until a Full Bench decided the pending question on the applicability of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It noted that an outright stay of the trial could cause substantial injustice and risk miscarriage of justice, but also recognised that the legal issue was already seized of by the Full Bench in a connected criminal appeal. The trial was therefore allowed to continue, while the court protected the accused by directing that the final judgment not be pronounced until the Full Bench rendered its decision. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:22:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277089 The Kerala HC addressed whether a trial's final judgment should be deferred until a Full Bench decided the pending question on the applicability of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It noted that an outright stay of the trial could cause substantial injustice and risk miscarriage of justice, but also recognised that the legal issue was already seized of by the Full Bench in a connected criminal appeal. The trial was therefore allowed to continue, while the court protected the accused by directing that the final judgment not be pronounced until the Full Bench rendered its decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277089