https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277093 Delay in moving to set aside a self-operating order was not explained for the entire period, as the affidavit covered only a later segment of the 171-day delay and did not account for the failure to act promptly after rejection of the appeal for non-removal of office objections. The explanation was treated as casual and insufficient cause was not shown, so condonation was refused and the application rejected. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:22:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277093 Delay in moving to set aside a self-operating order was not explained for the entire period, as the affidavit covered only a later segment of the 171-day delay and did not account for the failure to act promptly after rejection of the appeal for non-removal of office objections. The explanation was treated as casual and insufficient cause was not shown, so condonation was refused and the application rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277093