https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8252 Multiple high court rulings hold that where consignments move to a transporter's depot for reloading, omission of vehicle details in Part B of the e way bill at initial movement does not justify seizure if Part A and supporting documents are present; courts applied government clarifications allowing transporters to complete Part B at reloading, quashed seizure and penalty proceedings, and ordered release of goods and vehicles on furnishing indemnity or security. en-us Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:17:59 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:17:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8252 Multiple high court rulings hold that where consignments move to a transporter's depot for reloading, omission of vehicle details in Part B of the e way bill at initial movement does not justify seizure if Part A and supporting documents are present; courts applied government clarifications allowing transporters to complete Part B at reloading, quashed seizure and penalty proceedings, and ordered release of goods and vehicles on furnishing indemnity or security. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:17:59 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8252