https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277079 In preventive detention law, "foreign powers" was given its ordinary meaning, so a sovereign Commonwealth country such as Pakistan could fall within that description; detention based on activities prejudicial to India's relations with foreign powers was therefore valid. The grounds of detention were held sufficiently particularised because the supporting extracts disclosed the basis of the detention and enabled an effective representation, even if not every detail was supplied. The Advisory Board procedure also raised no natural justice breach, as the statute allowed further material to be sought and confidential information to be withheld in the public interest. The detention was upheld on all substantive grounds. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:13:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277079 In preventive detention law, "foreign powers" was given its ordinary meaning, so a sovereign Commonwealth country such as Pakistan could fall within that description; detention based on activities prejudicial to India's relations with foreign powers was therefore valid. The grounds of detention were held sufficiently particularised because the supporting extracts disclosed the basis of the detention and enabled an effective representation, even if not every detail was supplied. The Advisory Board procedure also raised no natural justice breach, as the statute allowed further material to be sought and confidential information to be withheld in the public interest. The detention was upheld on all substantive grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277079