<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277076</link>
    <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of deferred revenue expenditure claimed as revenue expenditure was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the bona fide belief of the assessee and the debatable nature of the expenditure&#039;s classification, ultimately dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277076</link>
      <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of deferred revenue expenditure claimed as revenue expenditure was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the bona fide belief of the assessee and the debatable nature of the expenditure&#039;s classification, ultimately dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>