<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277072</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat advertisement expenditure as revenue in nature, following precedents emphasizing business realities over enduring benefit. Additionally, the ITAT supported the use of the Resale Price Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions, rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s approach. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277072</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat advertisement expenditure as revenue in nature, following precedents emphasizing business realities over enduring benefit. Additionally, the ITAT supported the use of the Resale Price Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions, rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s approach. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>