https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277069 A suit cognizable as a small cause remained subject to the Small Cause Courts Act even though the Subordinate Judge followed regular Civil Procedure Code procedure. The departure from summary procedure did not change the suit's character or take it outside the exclusive small cause jurisdiction created by Act XI of 1865. The finality clause in Section 21 applied to suits tried within the jurisdiction under Sections 2 and 6, not merely to cases conducted in a particular form. As the claim belonged exclusively to that jurisdiction, no appeal lay to the District Court and its decree was without jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 1887 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:57:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277069 A suit cognizable as a small cause remained subject to the Small Cause Courts Act even though the Subordinate Judge followed regular Civil Procedure Code procedure. The departure from summary procedure did not change the suit's character or take it outside the exclusive small cause jurisdiction created by Act XI of 1865. The finality clause in Section 21 applied to suits tried within the jurisdiction under Sections 2 and 6, not merely to cases conducted in a particular form. As the claim belonged exclusively to that jurisdiction, no appeal lay to the District Court and its decree was without jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Oct 1887 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277069