<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15351</link>
    <description>The court held that the agreement dated December 16, 1975, was valid and fell under the proviso to section 9(1)(vi), exempting the royalty payment from taxation in India. The assessee was not liable under section 9(1)(i) or section 9(1)(vi), and the decision favored the assessee on all counts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15351</link>
      <description>The court held that the agreement dated December 16, 1975, was valid and fell under the proviso to section 9(1)(vi), exempting the royalty payment from taxation in India. The assessee was not liable under section 9(1)(i) or section 9(1)(vi), and the decision favored the assessee on all counts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>