<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15341</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether statutory contributions to provident fund and employees&#039; state insurance paid within the statutory grace period are allowable deductions. The HC held that payments made within the grace time permitted under the relevant statute must be deducted while computing taxable income, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s view; the deduction was consequently allowed. A second issue was whether air-conditioners installed in computer rooms qualify for investment allowance. The HC held that where air-conditioning is necessary for optimum and safe operation of computers, it is an adjunct to the computer equipment (akin to a stabilizer) and is therefore eligible; investment allowance was consequently allowed. The revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15341</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether statutory contributions to provident fund and employees&#039; state insurance paid within the statutory grace period are allowable deductions. The HC held that payments made within the grace time permitted under the relevant statute must be deducted while computing taxable income, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s view; the deduction was consequently allowed. A second issue was whether air-conditioners installed in computer rooms qualify for investment allowance. The HC held that where air-conditioning is necessary for optimum and safe operation of computers, it is an adjunct to the computer equipment (akin to a stabilizer) and is therefore eligible; investment allowance was consequently allowed. The revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>