https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370787 The Allahabad High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the seizure of goods unjustified as the E-way bill requirement was not applicable during the relevant period. The court quashed the seizure order under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act and dropped all subsequent proceedings, providing relief to the petitioner. The judgment underscores the significance of complying with legal requirements and the consequences of seizing goods without proper justification, emphasizing the importance of adherence to relevant laws and regulations. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370787 The Allahabad High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the seizure of goods unjustified as the E-way bill requirement was not applicable during the relevant period. The court quashed the seizure order under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act and dropped all subsequent proceedings, providing relief to the petitioner. The judgment underscores the significance of complying with legal requirements and the consequences of seizing goods without proper justification, emphasizing the importance of adherence to relevant laws and regulations. Case-Laws GST Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370787