<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370765</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessing officer had not erred in allowing the amortisation of ESOP expenses, as the expenses were found to be allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous and did not meet the twin conditions required for revision under section 263. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and no revision under section 263 was deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370765</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessing officer had not erred in allowing the amortisation of ESOP expenses, as the expenses were found to be allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous and did not meet the twin conditions required for revision under section 263. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and no revision under section 263 was deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>