https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370735 An adjudication order that reached mutually inconsistent conclusions on the same evidence and allegations, without adequate reasoned analysis, could not be sustained. Where documents and affidavits were accepted in one part of the order but disregarded elsewhere without sufficient justification, the findings were treated as incoherent and as failing to address the parties' allegations and defences properly. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, with both sides to be given a fair opportunity to present their case and all issues kept open. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:34:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370735 An adjudication order that reached mutually inconsistent conclusions on the same evidence and allegations, without adequate reasoned analysis, could not be sustained. Where documents and affidavits were accepted in one part of the order but disregarded elsewhere without sufficient justification, the findings were treated as incoherent and as failing to address the parties' allegations and defences properly. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, with both sides to be given a fair opportunity to present their case and all issues kept open. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370735